ECMP
355 – Major Project Assessment Rubric
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
|
Originality |
The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people’s ideas,
products, images and inventions.
There is no evidence of new thought. |
The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people’s
ideas, products, images, or inventions.
There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness. |
The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based on an extensive collection of
other people’s ideas, products, images, or inventions, the work extends
beyond that collection to offer new insights. |
The product shows significant evidence of originality & inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions of real needs. |
|
|
Subject Knowledge |
Subject knowledge is not evident.
Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed. |
Some subject knowledge is evident.
Some information is confusing incorrect or flawed. |
Subject knowledge is evident in much of the product. Information is clear, appropriate, and
correct. |
Subject knowledge is evident throughout (more than required). All information is clear, appropriate,
and correct. |
|
|
Organization of Content |
No logical sequence of information; menus and paths to information
are not evident. |
Some logical sequence of information, but menus and paths are
confusing or flawed. |
Logical sequence of information. Menus and paths to information are
clear and direct. |
Logical, intuitive sequence of information. Menus and paths to information are clear and direct. |
|
|
Mechanics |
Presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has three or more misspellings and/or grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has two or more misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
|
|
Use of Enhancements |
No video, audio, HTML, or other suitable enhancements are present or
use of these tools is inappropriate. |
Limited video, audio, HTML, or other enhancements are present. In most instances, use of these tools is
inappropriate. |
Some video, audio, HTML, or other enhancements are use appropriately
to entice users to learn and to enrich the experience. In some cases, clips are either too long,
or too short to be meaningful. |
Appropriate amounts of video, audio, HTML, or other enhancements are
used effectively. Clips are long
enough to convey meaning without being too lengthy. |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
|
Commitment to End User and usability. |
The project shows no commitment to the intended end-user of this
project. |
The project shows little commitment to the user and poor usability. |
The project shows well thought-out and practiced thought towards an
end-user. |
Usability is excellent and intuitive. The author shows strong commitment to the end-user. |
|
|
Technology |
The use of technology was not deemed to be appropriate for this
project. |
The use of technology added very little enhancement or value to the
final project. |
The use of technology is deemed appropriate for this project. |
The use of technology was deemed appropriate for this project, and
served to strong value. |
|
|
Visual Design |
The project reflects little thought or research in practices of
visual design formats and techniques. |
The project reflects some thought or practice in the good use of
visual design formats and techniques. |
The project demonstrates good use of visual design formats,
practices, and techniques. |
The project is visually sound and the author demonstrates excellent
use of visual design practices, formats, and techniques. |
|
|
Perceived Educational Value |
The project will/does not provide educational value to either the
creator or end user. |
The project will/does not provide education value to an end
user. The project does/will provide
some educational value to the creator. |
The project will/does provides some educational value to both the
creator and end users. |
The project will/does provide strong educational value to both the
creator and end users. |
|
|
Difficulty and Time Commitment |
I perceive that the project would have been completed with no
difficulty and little to no time commitment. |
I perceive that the creator could have completed the project with
little difficulty and a short time commitment. |
I perceive that the project would have been moderately difficult for
the creator to complete. |
I perceive that the project would have required a lengthy time
investment and a high degree of difficulty for the creator. |
|
|
Final Mark |
|
|
|
/40 |
% |
Additional Comments/Areas for
Improvement: